BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date:
Fri, 27 Sep 2013 12:58:00 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
From:
James Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
> I think it's strange that so many people are defending its use in food
production.

I haven't seen anyone defend the use of Fumagillin in food production at
all.

I did ask if the two papers cited (cites [2] and [14] ) might be the basis
for concern about Fumagillin persistence, and this would have impact on
harvestable honey, and also on the control of Nosema, as the focus needed to
be brought back to the data.

I do think that the title of the study cited, "Nosema ceranae Escapes
Fumagillin Control in Honey Bees" is a bit over-the-top, given that their
own data showed that Nosema ceranae DID NOT Escape Fumagillin Control when
the proper dose was given.  Neither did Nosema apis.

A title of "Small Doses of Antibiotics Make Matters Worse" would seem to be
more appropriate for this study, but no one asked us.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2