BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 9 Jul 2013 12:50:37 -0600
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
From:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
In-Reply-To:
Organization:
Deep Thought
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
> I do not remember anyone ever posting to this List that the neonic
> seed treatments are harmless to bees.  Am I mistaken?

If anyone cares to read and re-read and ponder the conversations here,
as I do often, I think that it would be clear that this was strongly
implied, and even assumed by some, if not stated in those exact words.

I also think that this is why some people think that some writers here
are pro-chemical when in fact they are not.  Language is a blunt
instrument and often writers do not take the effort to carefully qualify
their words -- or consider the impact on a casual reader or those with
limited English.

I strive to be very precise in my language, but that does not stop some
from nit-picking.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2