HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Richard Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 9 Feb 2018 05:56:02 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
Is it the grammar or meaning that you are worried about?

What you write looks like an extract from page 147 of Robert Chapman's
and Alison Wylie's 2016 book _Evidential Reasoning in Archaeology_.

"Conceptual schemes proposing a succession of prehistoric 'ages' were
founded on typologies that capture patterns of association among
artefacts found buried together (e.g. in burials and hoards . . .),
seriations that document the orderly succession of form and design
with classes of artefacts . . ., and the stratified deposition of this
material." 

I would not quarrel with their meaning. 

Richard

----- Original Message -----
From: "HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY" 
To:
Cc:
Sent:Thu, 8 Feb 2018 20:57:15 +0100
Subject:Quote

 "Typologies. capture patterns of association among artefacts found
buried
 together. seriations. document the orderly succession of form and
design
 within classes of artefact."

 Anyone care to try to explain how this got past the editors???

 ############################

 To unsubscribe from the HISTARCH list:
 write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
 or click the following link:
 http://community.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-LSOFTDONATIONS.exe?SUBED1=HISTARCH&A=1


############################

To unsubscribe from the HISTARCH list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://community.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-LSOFTDONATIONS.exe?SUBED1=HISTARCH&A=1

ATOM RSS1 RSS2