Is that the Heidegger that owns Kiehls "since 1851" in Manhattan, one of
the few who have climbed to the top of Mt. Everest without oxygen, a friend
of the former Governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger, who had (has)
a collection of historic American motorcycles in one half of the shop at
100 Third Ave., NY, NY? Of course not.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:00 AM, HISTARCH automatic digest system <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> There are 4 messages totaling 97 lines in this issue.
>
> Topics of the day:
>
> 1. Archaeology & phenomenology (4)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 16:27:22 +0100
> From: geoff carver <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Archaeology & phenomenology
>
> It's Sunday, and I'm bored and feel like kicking up some $hit; I've been
> sort of thinking about the role phenomenology plays in post-processualism,
> and wondering if there is any clear reason archaeologists often reference
> to
> Heidegger but not to, say, Bergson or Husserl.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 13:15:27 -0500
> From: N Mathews <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: Archaeology & phenomenology
>
> I always thought archaeologists avoided Heidegger in favor of the other
> two. Heidegger being the Nazi and all. I could be wrong.
>
>
> On 11/23/2014 10:27 AM, geoff carver wrote:
> > It's Sunday, and I'm bored and feel like kicking up some $hit; I've been
> > sort of thinking about the role phenomenology plays in
> post-processualism,
> > and wondering if there is any clear reason archaeologists often
> reference to
> > Heidegger but not to, say, Bergson or Husserl.
> >
> > Any ideas?
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 20:22:12 +0100
> From: geoff carver <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: Archaeology & phenomenology
>
> I've only seen vague references to Heidegger, no citations to the others.
> What's strange about Heidegger is that his German has a reputation for
> being
> difficult to read, so I wonder how bad the translations are.
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
>
> I always thought archaeologists avoided Heidegger in favor of the other
> two.
> Heidegger being the Nazi and all. I could be wrong.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 16:53:46 -0800
> From: Mitch Allen <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: Archaeology & phenomenology
>
> Don't know particularly how archaeologists are treating this, but there
> has been a lot of recent work attempting to link postmodern thinking with
> classic phenomenology. Try the work of Karen Dahlberg and, more recently, a
> book on post-intentional phenomenology from us by Mark Vagle.
> http://www.lcoastpress.com/book.php?id=508
>
>
> Mitch Allen, Publisher
> Left Coast Press, Inc.
> 1630 N. Main Street, #400
> Walnut Creek, California 94596
> 925.935.3380 phone 925.935.2916 fax
> [log in to unmask]
> www.LCoastPress.com
> Like us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/LeftCoastPress
> Follow us on Twitter: @LeftCoastPress
>
>
>
> >________________________________
> > From: geoff carver <[log in to unmask]>
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2014 7:27 AM
> >Subject: Archaeology & phenomenology
> >
> >
> >It's Sunday, and I'm bored and feel like kicking up some $hit; I've been
> >sort of thinking about the role phenomenology plays in post-processualism,
> >and wondering if there is any clear reason archaeologists often reference
> to
> >Heidegger but not to, say, Bergson or Husserl.
> >
> >Any ideas?
> >
> >
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of HISTARCH Digest - 21 Nov 2014 to 23 Nov 2014 (#2014-220)
> ***************************************************************
>
|
