Don't know particularly how archaeologists are treating this, but there has been a lot of recent work attempting to link postmodern thinking with classic phenomenology. Try the work of Karen Dahlberg and, more recently, a book on post-intentional phenomenology from us by Mark Vagle. 
http://www.lcoastpress.com/book.php?id=508

 
Mitch Allen, Publisher
Left Coast Press, Inc.
1630 N. Main Street, #400
Walnut Creek, California 94596
925.935.3380 phone 925.935.2916 fax
[log in to unmask]
www.LCoastPress.com
Like us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/LeftCoastPress
Follow us on Twitter: @LeftCoastPress



>________________________________
> From: geoff carver <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask] 
>Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2014 7:27 AM
>Subject: Archaeology & phenomenology
> 
>
>It's Sunday, and I'm bored and feel like kicking up some $hit; I've been
>sort of thinking about the role phenomenology plays in post-processualism,
>and wondering if there is any clear reason archaeologists often reference to
>Heidegger but not to, say, Bergson or Husserl.
>
>Any ideas?
>
>
>