Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 6 Jun 2013 22:01:59 +0930 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Is anyone else on the List even following this?
>
> Avidly.
>
> Can't contribute, but very much following along.
>
> regards
> Deanna Corbett
> Hawke's Bay
> New Zealand
Ditto from Bugga-Bugga Creek Apiary. I really do appreciate that those with the ability and facility to close-read scientific (reputed and reputable) papers, who dissect and comment on results, and do so via this medium. It's like being in a permanent tutorial. I occasionally have a Big Yawn and a Mass Delete, and may pick up the thread several days later. For what it's worth, my Brown Stone Stats and Epi courses were based on study groups of 30 as a basis of statistical validity, and I tend to disregard studies of less than 30, as lacking statistical validity, and don't take much note of them, but I scan-read them and mentally file them as anecdotal. Every little bit helps.
So do keep on, Randy and Christina and the rest of the scientifically-minded contributors. After all, is this the essential point of BEE-L?
Certainly lurking, but literate.
LIDA BBC Apiary
Kangaroo Island.
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|