Lyle,
The freshwater mussel shells recovered from the site are between three and
four inches in length. From what I have read Native Americans sometimes
dried or smoked them. Herb Kraft excavated a pit at the Pahaquarra site in
the Delaware Water Gap which contained about 7,000 freshwater mussels. I
don't know if drying or smoking them would make them less rubbery but I have
eaten mussels cooked by professional chefs that were the consistency of
chewing gum.
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lyle E.
Browning
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 11:05 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Freshwater mussels on 18th century sites
On the question of consumption, assuming you're referring to the 4-5" long
shell that is usually black on the exterior (at least the ones I saw in the
incredibly polluted Tidewater James River in VA), how were they cooked to be
edible? All reports I've had, including one attempt on my own, left a rather
large rubber pellet;)
Unless they were meant to be consumed as some consume oysters, ie, as
sliders.
Lyle Browning
On Jan 24, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Bill wrote:
> Thanks Jim,
>
> Yes I was aware of the button cottage industry in Delaware, in fact we hit
a small deposit on the Route 301 project for DelDOT. No evidence for making
button, purely consumption.
>
> Bill Liebeknecht
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jim
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:12 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Freshwater mussels on 18th century sites
>
> Probably not the case in your situation, but freshwater mussels were used
to make shell buttons. Cheryl Claasen published a SHA monograph on the
subject. Delaware sustained a cottage industry in making shell button blanks
from imported shell, the blanks then shipped to Connecticut for finishing;
but this was in the 20th century, ending abruptly in the early 1990s.
>
>
>
> James G. Gibb
>
> Gibb Archaeological Consulting
>
> 2554 Carrollton Road
>
> Annapolis, Maryland USA ?? 21403
>
> 443.482.9593 (Land) 410.693.3847 (Cell)
>
> www.gibbarchaeology.net ? www.porttobacco.blogspot.com
>
> On 01/24/13, Bill<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Thanks! I will.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Keith
Doms
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 9:15 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Freshwater mussels on 18th century sites
>
> I think we had 1 or 2 from Block 1191 Wilmington but that is nineteenth
century. Check with Alice to see if she had any from Thompson's Loss and
Gain.
>
> KRD
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bill
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 9:06 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Freshwater mussels on 18th century sites
>
> Recent excavations on an early 18th century site in central Delaware
recovered some freshwater mussel shells amongst the faunal remains.
> Normally freshwater mussels are associated with Native American sites in
the Middle Atlantic region. This presents the possibility of a Native
American presence or interaction with the European inhabitants of the site
(circa
> 1720 to 1735). Several glass seed beads recovered from floatation further
support this theory. My question is: Has anyone found freshwater mussel
shells on non-Native American 18th century sites in the region?
>
> Thanks for your input in advance!
>
> Bill Liebeknecht, MA, RPA
> Principal Investigator
> Hunter Research, Inc.
> Trenton, New Jersey
|