BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date:
Sat, 4 May 2013 17:56:51 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
Sender:
From:
Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
> Actually, I'm saying that her statement runs contrary to what  EPA is legally mandated to do.  Contrary  to the assertions of the Fraziers, EPA  does not necessary reject data just because it was exploratory and/or not  performed under GLP.

Then why is she raising this issue in this way in front of the whole world for the record? That's what I don't get. She did not respond to my direct inquiry (not surprisingly, I am sure she gets way more mail than me)

Pete

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2