Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 16 Mar 2013 16:09:23 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>I am not disputing Randy's math but he doesn't show each years added
pesticide.
Sorry Bob, was rushing off to conference! Simple formula--assigned a value
of 1 for treatment. Each year's end residues would be (1+ previous year's
residue) * 0.5
And yes, if land is rotated, then residue buildup would be much less.
Grass appeared to increase degradation.
>Randy Oliver, currently in corn country (Iowa), with beekeepers
>> approaching me left and right telling me how their bees do just fine
>> around corn!
>>
>>
> >Including planting dust???
>
I ask them about that. Many don't notice dust issues at all. Others
notice minor kill for a few days. It appears that situations such as yours
in Ontario are the exception rather than the rule. I feel strongly that in
such cases beekeepers shouldn't be forced to swallow the losses without
compensation!
--
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|