BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ernie Huber <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Jun 2012 20:58:59 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Peter said:
 "I would think the closest match to natural swarming would be the Demaree Method"

It sounds like Adam's proposed method could be called a "Horizontal Demaree" rather than the Demaree that Peter descibes, which is a vertical stacking of the boxes. Wouldn't the only difference in bee distributions be that the young bees could not get to the brood nest in the horizontal separation method whereas some of them could get to the brood nest in the classic vertical method that Peter describes. So couldn't one actually simulate the classic Demaree in Adam's horizontal method by just leaving a few bees on each of the shaken frames before placing them back on the old stand ? I would think most of the bees still clinging to the shaken frames would be young bees. Also, with just a few bees left on each frame you could make sure that the queen wasn't among them. Seems like it ought to work ? Maybe even better ?
                                                              Ernie Huber
 
 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2