HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:57:57 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (63 lines)
In the United States there are a large number of people who take exception to the celebratory aspects of this particular event. Although not a person of color, I share in the sentiment that this was an awful war precipitated by an inhumane institution. We should reflect on it and its repercussions...we still live with them. No doubt there are similar occurrences in other countries that strike a nerve. 
James G. Gibb

Gibb Archaeological Consulting

2554 Carrollton Road

Annapolis, Maryland USA    21403

443.482.9593

www.gibbarchaeology.org    www.porttobacco.blogspot.com

Apr 12, 2011 07:49:49 PM, [log in to unmask] wrote:

Loosen up James 


Graham Arriola
Freedom of Information Officer
Services Division
Dept Premier and Cabinet 
(08) 82070923
[log in to unmask]
L16, State Administrative Centre, 200 Victoria Square ADELAIDE SA 5000  
'Information contained in this email message may be confidential and may also be the subject of legal professional privilege or public interest immunity. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this document is unauthorised.'


-----Original Message-----
From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jim
Sent: Wednesday, 13 April 2011 9:19 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: FW: Today in history

It isn't calling attention to the event that I object to, although it could hardly come as news to the subscribers of this listserv...it is the choice of words and the lack of balance inherent in those words. I don't mind Civil War/War Between the States, although I think it flies in the face of most historiography, but the original posting calling the event aggression followed by the sequel claiming occupation strikes me as political, and that seems inappropriate for this venue. I would much rather hear about some new archaeological insights into the conflict and its aftermath than the long string of postings that likely will follow this exchange and distract participants from their research while clogging everybody's inbox.
James G. Gibb

Gibb Archaeological Consulting

2554 Carrollton Road

Annapolis, Maryland USA    21403

443.482.9593

www.gibbarchaeology.org    www.porttobacco.blogspot.com

Apr 12, 2011 07:38:26 PM, [log in to unmask] wrote:

Actually, I disagree. It is not a political statement at all. If historical archaeology deals with historical facts and documents, then this is a very good place for this information to appear.

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Jim  wrote:
> I withdraw my question...it is a political statement, and one best made--if at all--somewhere other than in a professional listserv.
> James G. Gibb


--
Anita Cohen-Williams
Social Media Marketing and Management
http://mysearchguru.com
http://twitter.com/searchguru
Listowner of Histarch and Sub-Arch

ATOM RSS1 RSS2