HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Conrad Bladey <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:09:21 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Always my view. It is my believe that far too much time and effort into ceramic manufacture type while far too little work has been spent on the identification and analysis of secondary ceramic disposal structures and types thereof. More attention to essential material attribute would provide great rewards in this regard

Conrad Bladey

----------------------------
This message has been written by fingers that are too big!

On Feb 22, 2012, at 12:36 PM, "Nancy S.  Dickinson" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> tinted wares, but the other
> potters referred to the ware as “China  Glaze” and it appears that their 
> use
> of that

ATOM RSS1 RSS2