>>>> if 96% of the parent compound and metabolites are broken down to CO2 in 72 hours, how can you maintain that the binding is "irreversible"?
What happened to the remaining 4%? Is that all it would take to overwhelm the spots where binding takes place? Would that bee all that's necessary to make the stipulation that the binding is irreversible plausible? I don't know. The questions just popped into my mind as I read the post.
Mike in LA
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html