> with n > 1)for chemical carcinogens

What does n represent in this context?

Just glancing this over and not reading the papers referenced (since my 
mind is already made up and I don't want to be influenced by more 
made-up 'facts' :)), I have to say that these suggestions look highly 
speculative to me.

I always have to wonder about the word, 'inferred'.

I see too far too much inferring and too little proving on all sides of 
this debate for my comfort.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm