BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:09:50 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
> Ellis, Hayes, Ellis
> http://www.springerlink.com/content/lk80j0017v01w026/

In scanning the abstract, I note this, and think it very interesting:

"we found that the use of small cell foundation did not significantly affect cm2 total brood"

Years back when we compared 5.25mm cells (Pierco) to 5.35mm cells (Permadent) and found the bees drew roughly the same number of cells during the time of the test, but a lesser _area_ in the smaller cells.  They produced more honey on the smaller cells in our test.  (Note those 5.25mm Pierco cells are actually around what most people consider'normal' size for most EHB -- 5.2mm -- not 'small cell' as defined by the 4.9 crowd, and were compared to cells which are in the larger range -- 5.35 -- suited to some strains of EHB).

If bees raise the same "cm2 total brood" in larger and smaller cells, then they are raising more bees in the smaller cells.

This is of interest in regions where ambient temperatures can be cold during build-up periods.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2