HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:05:35 +0000
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
Lara Band <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<001f01cdb600$bcb3fd20$361bf760$@de>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
There's a section on field drainage in Tarlow, S. 2007. The Archaeology 
of Improvement in Britain, 1750-1850, Cambridge University Press, p. 59-62.
/Lara

On 29/10/2012 18:10, geoff carver wrote:
> There was an article on the problem that few people document them in a
> recent book called "Reconsidering Fieldwork."
> Jones & Richardson reference a ppaper in "Water management in the English
> landscape" (Edinburgh, 1999): "Arable land drainage in the early nineteenth
> century." Might have some useful references.
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
>
> Has anyone done any research on agricultural drainage tiles? How much of an
> agricultural field is disturbed from the installation of drainage tile?
> Are/were the tiles installed at an average depth? Does anyone know of any
> reference material on this topic?
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2