Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="euc-kr" |
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:28:20 +0000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Just FYI, the last line of Bender's quote formatted weird. It should read,
"There is a "we-ness" in a community; one is a member."
Mike,
While not necessarily widely used in anthropological literature, a
definition you might find interesting that I've used in the past comes
from Bender's book Community and social change in America. (Baltimore:
Johns Hopkins University Press 1982).
Bender©ös definition: A community involves a limited number of people in a
somewhat restricted social space or network held together by shared
understanding and a sense of obligation. Relationships are close, often
intimate, and usually face-to-face. Individuals are bound together by
affective or emotional ties rather than by a perception of individual
self-interest. There is a Owe-ness©ö in a community; one is a member.
(1982, 7-8)
Cheers,
On 4/20/12 5:26 PM, "mike strutt" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Dear Histarchers,
>
>So what is your favorite anthropological definition of community (a
>citation of the originator would be appreciated)? What is your
>definition of community among an enslaved population? Would it be
>different from the above, or different from say an immigrant group living
>in a new country? Ideas as well as definitions welcome. Looking for ways
>community is defined in terms of who is part of it, or not. . .
Todd A. Hanson, Ph.D.
Environmental Programs
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|