Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 6 Jun 2014 08:39:12 -0700 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Message-ID: |
<8882FBCA7E2742E78DC8055BA28741F6@aaronpc> |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Many of these things were fed to the pigs.
If they were nearby, Gypsies ate "dead meat"
Farmers here that I asked - in the 1900s, mind - they buried them.
My uncle's family in Montana dumped carcasses in a ravine and let the
scavengers have them.
A local butcher told me he butchered them for local families who ate them.
None of this is early 18th century though, just what I've gotten by asking.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Liebeknecht" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 4:51 AM
Subject: Re: Colonial Horses Part 2
> Questions:
>
>
>
> 1. If you lived in a rural early 18th century setting and your horse
> died, what would you do with the body?
>
>
>
> 2. The smell would become putrid rather quickly and let's face it
> horses weigh a ton, so would you salvage what you could, hide, hooves .???
>
>
>
> 3. Then what, would you quarter it much like you would do when elk
> hunting to haul it away from your homestead? This should leave cleaver
> marks but not cut marks.
>
>
>
> 4. During the first half of the 18th century what mechanisms were in
> place to dispose of old, dead or sickly horses? Later there were glue
> factories, dog food companies and fertilizer companies.
>
>
>
> Any thoughts would be appreciated.
>
>
>
> Bill Liebeknecht, RPA
>
> Hunter Research, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.932 / Virus Database: 3955.1.1/7123 - Release Date: 06/04/14
14:43:00
|
|
|