HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:17:20 -0400
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Lyle E. Browning" <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
Archaeologists use the trinomial system to record archaeologists. Architectural historians use something else, at least here in VA.

Are there states that have one numbering system for everything? We have had archaeologists who can't deal with buildings and buildings are often recorded with no regard for the archaeological sites around them, although this is waning, thankfully.

But, with an idea towards looking to the totally computerized future and recognizing that architectural sites also have archaeological components, are there states who've taken the jump and if so how?

Thanks in advance,

Lyle Browning, RPA

ATOM RSS1 RSS2