George Miller should weigh in on this.
-----Original Message-----
From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mark Branstner
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 8:46 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Twifflers, etc.
Hey Guys
Hist Arch 101 question, so please bear with me ...
Are there REALLY standardized dimensions (i.e., six inch vs. 7-inch
or whatever) for dinnerware vessel forms, e.g., table plates, supper
plates, twifflers, and muffins, etc. Do these descriptors apply to
1820-1860 assemblages? And can somebody give me a readily accessible
reference to where this is laid out?
Thanks in advance.
Mark
--
Mark C. Branstner, RPA
Historic Archaeologist
Illinois State Archaeological Survey
Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
209 Nuclear Physics Lab, MC-571
23 East Stadium Drive
Champaign, IL 61820
Phone: 217.244.0892
Fax: 217.244.7458
Cell: 517.927.4556
[log in to unmask]
"There's absolutely nothing wrong with Marxism, so long as you stop
at "A Day At The Races." If you keep on with "At the Circus," etc.,
suddenly, Marxism doesn't seem all that interesting and you start to
look for something a bit more competent, like Chaplinism or
Stoogeism" - Anonymous
"I hope there's pudding" - Luna Lovegood (HP5)
|