HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:21:58 -0400
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
From:
Jay and Beth Stottman <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (54 lines)
Perhaps it was a house cleaning episode associated with a change in 
occupancy.  I have seen such deposits (mostly with privies) where large 
amounts of household debris, such as sets of dishes, glassware, etc. were 
dumped when a change occurred in the function of the property (from 
residential to commercial) or in occupants (a long term resident moves and 
downsizes).  The deposits coincided with documented changes in occupancy 
found in the archival record.

Jay

M. Jay Stottman
Staff Archaeologist
Kentucky Archaeological Survey
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John M. Foster, RPA" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 2:51 PM
Subject: Questions about residential deposit


We have recently excavated a tightly dated deposit (1890s) of residential
artifacts. The majority of the deposit appears to be ceramics from at least
four British makers. Other items include pressed glass, glass candy dish,
perfume caddy, horse shoe (one), one French toothbrush, one large comb, 
couple
of decomposed cans of indeterminate size, pickle jar, several Prosser 
buttons,
condiment bottle, sets of glass stemware, window glass, and one ceramic doll 
or
figurine face. There was no cutlery, cooking ware, tools, and very little
bone.

Based on weathering of broken edges, it appears that the items were broken
elsewhere, as opposed to fresh fractures from excavation, and then deposited 
in
a prepared pit (3 x 3 x 2 feet). Only one whole bottle was recovered. All 
the
ceramics were broken and appear to be from several sets of plain white
earthenware dishes. The artifacts appear to be average or slightly above in
cost. We are investigating the possibility that the artifacts may have 
resulted
from a single episode of deposition. The question is what might have 
occasioned
mass destruction of a collection of dining ware? We are investigating
earthquakes which are well-known for the area but would be interested in 
other
possibilities, which brings us to this list. Any comments or suggestions 
would
be appreciated.

John M. Foster, RPA Greenwood-Associates.com 310.454.3091 tel/fax 
310.717.5048
cell

ATOM RSS1 RSS2