HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Introductions
From:
Carl Steen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 10 May 2012 07:35:01 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines) 
Dr Schuyler- maybe you can update all the young folks on the "raging" debate over "historic" vs "historical" that went on back in the 1960s. I doubt the topic gets much coverage in grad schools these days.


Carl Steen



-----Original Message-----
From: Robert L. Schuyler <[log in to unmask]>
To: HISTARCH <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wed, May 9, 2012 11:08 pm
Subject: Re: Introductions


NO - over 90 means semi-divine or at least blessed by God. We will 
have to congratulate Ed Jelks on September 10th.



At 05:15 PM 5/9/2012, you wrote:
>And the only "paleolithic" archaeologists are those over 90, amongst
>whom I will be on 10 September.
>
>ebj
>
>On 5/9/2012 10:27 AM, Robert L. Schuyler wrote:
> > GOOD. The only "historic" archaeologists are those over 70 years old.
> >
> > RLS
> >

 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2