Histarch is a valuable tool to all professional and avocational historical archaeologists. Please let Anita continue her moderation as list owner without giving her grief . Anita provides a service to us that is without parallel and is actually much better than many of the other arch related lists I belong to. Her moderation is very fair-handed and carefully considered. She does an excellent job of keeping the list and topics focused.
dan allen
staff arch / president
cumberland research group, inc.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lucy Wayne" <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:46:38 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: Should HISTARCH continue?
I agree.
Lucy Wayne
----- Original Message -----
From: <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 6:36 AM
Subject: Re: Should HISTARCH continue?
>I second that. There are a lot of us who read and lurk who would miss it if
>you quit.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carl Steen <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 7:31 am
> Subject: Re: Should HISTARCH continue?
>
>
>
> Anita -
>
> Thanks for running this list. Please don't get discouraged and give it up.
> We
> all appreciate it and learn from it. I for one am not in an academic
> environment, so this one of the few places I can interact with other
> professionals who consider themselves "Historical Archaeologists."? In my
> opinion, you are the greatest, and moderate the list wisely.
>
> Carl Steen
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anita Cohen-Williams <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 6:51 pm
> Subject: Should HISTARCH continue?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Considering all the discussion around whether or not Marco Polo should
> be included in a discussion of Historical Archaeology (i.e.
> archaeology of the modern world, 1400 forward), I am wondering if I
> should continue running HISTARCH.
>
> I have been running this discussion list alone since 1994 without pay
> from any source, as a labor of love. I am not a professor nor
> librarian in any university, the SHA does not pay me (although they do
> use this forum), and I am not an employee of any governmental agency.
> Nor am I paid to run ArchaeoSeek, although several people have stepped
> up and donated monies for the $20 a month that it costs.
>
> In light of that, and the fact that, while I do keep an eye on the
> discussions and attempt to keep them on topic, this list is NOT
> moderated nor censored. Considering the current tone of this latest
> discussion, I am wondering if it all was a waste.
>
> --
> Anita Cohen-Williams
> Organic SEO and Social Media Marketing
> http://www.mysearchguru.com
> Twitter: @searchguru
> Listowner of HISTARCH
>
>
>
>
>
|