>I suggest that you visit the web page for FeedBee. There are a number of
>published papers on that product, in comparison to pollen and other products
>presented in full for you to assess on your own. 

Thanks for the suggestion.  I did, and we will.

It turns out that the website -- http://www.feedbee.com/ -- provides excellent grist for the infamous BEE-L mill. 

Can you spot the spelling error on the front page?  Can you spot how the 'studies' were slanted to favour the preferred product and to achieve the desired result?  Do you know what pollen was used for comparison? 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm