BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
allen dick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 31 Oct 2010 08:18:41 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
> Comparing hives with and without drone comb, Seeley found:
> This study examined the impact on a colony’s honey production of
> providing it with a nat- ural amount (20%) of drone comb. Colonies with
> drone comb gained only 25.2 +- 16.0 kg whereas those without drone comb
> gained 48.8 +- 14.8 kg.

Is that the same study where frames of solid drone comb were placed in
positions 3 and 7?  If so, that is not normal and impedes the build-up of
expanding colonies, since normally those positions are worker comb and
pretty well full of worker brood during build-up.

As for the varroa observations, they make sense to me.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2