Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:34:00 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thanks, George ...
Given the vagaries of those price list/size comparisons, is it even
reasonable to apply categories like muffins, twifflers, and plates to
archaeological specimens, or would it be far more judicious to
simply size grade by diameter, and infer function? Obviously, big
plates that are not platters are plates, but how about those smaller
diameter pieces?
Mark
--
Mark C. Branstner, RPA
Historic Archaeologist
Illinois State Archaeological Survey
Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
209 Nuclear Physics Lab, MC-571
23 East Stadium Drive
Champaign, IL 61820
Phone: 217.244.0892
Fax: 217.244.7458
Cell: 517.927.4556
[log in to unmask]
"There's absolutely nothing wrong with Marxism, so long as you stop
at "A Day At The Races." If you keep on with "At the Circus," etc.,
suddenly, Marxism doesn't seem all that interesting and you start to
look for something a bit more competent, like Chaplinism or
Stoogeism" - Anonymous
"I hope there's pudding" - Luna Lovegood (HP5)
|
|
|