Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:18:17 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 25-Apr-12, at 4:23 AM, Chris Slade wrote:
>
> The impression is given that a chemical is safe after the expiry
> of its half life and this may, in some cases, not be so.
>
Hi Chris and all
I think that the number of 'half-lifes' before the chemical is safe
is the important statement. Seven 'half-lifes' are needed to decay
to below 1%. With imidicloprid the half life is 3 hours to 444 days
depending on where it is found, water, clay, sand, etc, and who is
talking. I believe, like Stan, that retreating the same area again
before the chemical has depleted itself complicates the issue further.
Bob Darrell
Caledon Ontario
Canada
44N80W
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm
|
|
|