BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Trevor Weatherhead <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 23 Jan 2011 18:09:41 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Peter wrote

> The clinical importance of DWV infection in beesā?T heads was also 
> substantiated by a study that demonstrated that injecting DWV into forager 
> bees resulted in learning deficits.

I remember many years ago when "the muck" (see archives) turned up in 
Australia it was originally thought to be Kashmir Bee Virus (KBV) as it had 
been isolated from some of the larvae.  It was sent to England and injected 
into larvae which died.  So it was assumed that what we now know as "the 
muck" was KBV and the field symptoms were written up as such.  This lead to 
some export problems.  It wasn't until later when samples sent away did not 
yield KBV that it was realised that what we were seeing was not caused by 
KBV.  It also meant that KBV did not cause the symptoms that had been 
published.

What it did show was that if you directly inject the virus into the bee or 
larvae, it will die.  This is not a natural way and could mean results that 
are not accurate as was the case with KBV.

Trevor Weatherhead
AUSTRALIA 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2