BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Date:
Sun, 30 Jan 2011 13:21:38 -0800
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
>
> >Do we know why neither has been approved? Is it because they are cheap and
> generic and easily obtained and thus it isn't worth any commercial company
> seeking approval, as there is no profit for them?  If that is the case,
> maybe an association of beekeepers could apply for approval.


Yes for oxalic.  With liquid formic there is a safety issue.  I've put a bug
into Dave Mendes's (ABF president) recently.  It would help for members to
write to the leaders of our national organizations.  Liquid formic is likely
a lost cause at this time, but Canada has recently registered oxalic
dribble, so there is no reason that the US can't piggyback onto their
registration, which is what we are doing with fumagillin.

Randy Oliver

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2