HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
scarlett <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 20 Nov 2010 12:40:55 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (165 lines)
I agree with Skip- interesting!  This  system would only make sense  
for a pottery operating on a "goods-from-hand" system, instead of a  
goods-from-oven system for determining payment.  Have any others heard  
of this ring pattern?
Cheers
Tim
On Nov 20, 2010, at 12:30 PM, Leslie C. Skip Stewart-Abernathy wrote:

> This is either an amazingly neglected topic or it is entirely  
> irrelevant to  human existence, but at any event I am fascinated. If  
> it weren't for the account of an actual potter passed down through  
> his grandson I would say the subject is irrelevant and as subject to  
> "just so" and mythic explanations as the raised dots on the bottom  
> of snuff bottles. However, this is now similar to looking at the  
> technical knowledge known only to guild members. And it's more  
> relevant to me than many of the latest developments in pyramid  
> studies.
>
> The use of concentric lines/ridges to identify single potters raises  
> (oops) many questions. Were the plates press molded or slip cast?  
> Did each potter (or machine operator?) have their own bottom mold or  
> mold half custom prepared and/or assigned? Did this code stay the  
> same regardless of the overall plate form/dimensions/changes through  
> time  or did the code shift with new styles or production runs? Does  
> this ring code indicate an entire line of work back in the mold shop  
> with associated records and interchangeable tools to make the mold/ 
> whatever unique?  And was this code unique to the "National  
> Brotherhood of Operative Potters" as included on the Cronin plate I  
> have (only at hand as a photo on my laptop)?
>
> My type collection is at the office and I am at home, but a quick  
> check of our home dishes, not in sets for the most part I might add,  
> have no rings. The revived Homer Laughlin Fiesta plates do (9" has 6  
> evenly spaced, 10 1/2" has 6 but space between innermost 2 is less  
> than between others). These  plates are decorated with concentric  
> rings on the marley and in the well.  The two bowl forms we have  
> show no rings but the foot ring. Are the bottom rings still a code,  
> or "just" decoration?
>
> And  how come nobody's noticed the rings before? Or does George  
> Miller have a paper we don't know about? At minimum this gives me  
> something else to look at on the bottoms of vessels at the restaurant.
>
> At 03:15 PM 11/19/2010, you wrote:
>> Susan,
>>   We actually have a few teetering piles of Cronin around the house.
>> My grandfathers mark were 2 concentric lines approximately 2 inches  
>> from center of plate with a third concentric line close to the  
>> footring.   Each potter that actually made pieces had a specific  
>> mark, unique to them. It was partially used for Quality Control and  
>> for the amount of pieces made by a specific potter for quota's.   
>> Examples: Plates that were not holding up well, blemishes, or any  
>> below standard qualities could then be traced to the specific  
>> potter/maker and then be addressed.    A certain amount of items  
>> had to be finished by deadlines and they could count the quantity  
>> of dishes from a specific line in the factory by the marks ensuring  
>> each potter was 'keeping up' with production needs.
>>  So, the lines have more to deal with the actual worker/potter than  
>> a designer or a specific pattern. (At Cronin China)
>> I hope this helps clear things up.
>> If you have any other questions, I will be glad to answer them.
>> Douglas
>>
>>
>> --- On Fri, 11/19/10, Susan Walter <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Susan Walter <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: Re: lines UNDER plates
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Date: Friday, November 19, 2010, 12:34 PM
>>
>>
>> Hi D & L,
>>
>> Wow, how cool that you can find your Grandfather's work like that!   
>> (I'm afraid if I had that in my family history I'd "need" to buy  
>> every piece!  I can imagine the teetering piles...)
>>
>> I don't have a Cronin China Co. piece in my reference collection of  
>> complete wares.
>>
>> But, for instance, I have beside me a piece of Haviland's Ranson  
>> pattern.
>> The designer of this pattern, Ranson, for Haviland was possibly  
>> Paul Ranson. (Travis, Nora, 2000, Evolution of Haviland China  
>> Design, Schiffer, Atglen Pennsylvania: 143).
>> I want you to pretend Haviland = Cronin China Co., and Paul Ranson  
>> = your Grandfather
>>
>> Describing the bottom roughly:
>> starting at the very center -
>> - beginning near 3/16" from the middle are 2 concentric lines (@  
>> 3/16" apart) (lightest in prominence)
>> - then a space of about 1 3/4"
>> - then another set of concentric lines (@3/16" apart) (medium  
>> prominence)
>> - next the footring about 3/4" from that
>> - following at about another 3/4" is a single concentric line (this  
>> line is heaviest) in prominence
>>
>> So D & L, are you suggesting that - to the [Haviland Company/ 
>> Cronin] - these concentric lines meant [Paul Ranson/your Grandpa]?   
>> Or that they meant part of the patented Ranson shape?  Or both?
>>
>> So, would other Paul Ranson designed shapes have the same series of  
>> concentric lines?
>>
>> S.
>>
>> Disclaimer to everyone following this:  I understand that what  
>> Cronin China Co. did is not necessairily what Haviland did!
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "D & L" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 9:03 AM
>> Subject: Re: lines UNDER plates
>>
>>
>> My Grandfather worked for many years at the Cronin China factory in  
>> Ohio. He had told me the lines on the plates were a 'Makers Mark'  
>> in a way. Each potter placed a certain amount of circles, placed in  
>> a specific area on the plate bottom. This told which potter  
>> actually had made the item. I can still find plates bearing my  
>> Grandfathers marks at antique stores, etc. It amazes me to be able  
>> to hold an item that had actually passed through his hands.
>>
>>
>> --- On Thu, 11/18/10, Susan Walter <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Susan Walter <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: lines UNDER plates
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Date: Thursday, November 18, 2010, 11:03 AM
>>
>>
>> Nov. 18, 2010
>>
>> Hi All (Hi Carol!),
>>
>> A friend and I were discussing ceramics, and she reminded me of  
>> something.
>>
>> Often on the undersides of dishes are concentric lines that were  
>> molded into the vessel. They are usually inside the footring, but  
>> also occur outside of them.
>>
>> For us, they help to match up fragments of different vessels.
>>
>> But, she was asking, was there any specific original purpose to  
>> these?
>>
>> S. Walter
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 9.0.869 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3264 - Release Date:  
>> 11/17/10 23:37:00

ATOM RSS1 RSS2