Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 16 Sep 2010 20:09:52 -0700 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
<32445016.29794.1284687439216.JavaMail.root@m09> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
How about this... ??
There was brood above the (faulty?) excluder, which was then isolated
above two new supers,
and/or maybe the excluder was not in place until the two new supers were
placed.
In either case, the top super is from laying workers (?), and the queen
failed.
- OR, the top brood is from a older, trapped, virgin queen.
- John Edwards
Jim Smith wrote:
> ...
> Above the plastic queen excluder, and in the 3rd (top) super the same brood pattern was found, except it contained less brood. This was above two supers with honey.
>
>
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm
|
|
|