Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 25 Oct 2009 17:58:21 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I also don't know where the idea of recent, widespread use of DDT in the
U.S. came from - its been banned for three decades as others pointed out.
The bit of good news, whereas almost all of our bee analyses from the
60-90s showed residues of DDT, DDE, DDT and other chlorinated pesticides; the
most recent analyses that we've gotten back show a much reduced, if not
complete absence, of many of the most persistent chlorinated chemicals - so it
looks like we're finally getting some these out of the bee boxes/frames.
That's good news.
Frankly, I'm not so sure that I'd want to trade these older, more
persistent, and highly toxic chemicals for some of the newer insecticides.
Although the verdict may still be argued, many of the newer chemicals appear to be
less toxic, less persistent than the older chemicals. So, if you advocate
banning these, keep in mind what the alternatives might be.
Jerry
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
Access BEE-L directly at:
http://community.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-LSOFTDONATIONS.exe?A0=BEE-L
|
|
|