I know most of you have forgotten about this, since it has been so long.  We left town the day after I posted this, and this is the first time I have been back e shoe request, and this is the first time I have been back in the office.
 
Thanks to all who replied both on and off list.
 
Tom, the thinking behind more than one pair of shoes is that they were on an extended flight and almost certainly would have had a spare pair (at least).
 
Bill
 


>>> Thomas Wheeler <[log in to unmask]> 12/22/2010 6:25 PM >>>
Why would they both almost certainly had more than one pair?

Tom

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Lockhart, Bill" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 1:29 PM
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Shoes

> Hi Kris,
>
> Yes, we have a few -- that do not match the shoes we found, nor the photos 
> of Fred Noonan.
>
> However, they both almost certainly had more than one pair.
>
> Bill
>
>
>
>>>> Kris Oswald <[log in to unmask]> 12/21/2010 2:13 PM >>>
> Any photo's taken before/at her departure?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Lockhart, Bill
> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 4:11 PM
> To: [log in to unmask] 
> Subject: Shoes
>
> Do any of you know anyone who specializes in shoes.
>
> I am helping out with the group searching for Amelia Earhart on
> Nicumororo Island, and they need some good advise about some shoes they
> excavated.
>
> Best Christmas wishes to you all!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill
>
>
>
>
> Bill Lockhart
> Professor of Sociology
> New Mexico State University
> Alamogordo, NM
> (575) 439-3732
> WILLIAMS INTERNATIONAL                               A COMPANY WITH A 
> VISION
>
> This email message and any attachment(s) are for the sole use of the 
> intended
> recipient(s) and may contain proprietary and/or confidential information 
> which may
> be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure.
>
> Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If 
> you are
> not the intended recipient(s), please contact the sender by reply email 
> and destroy
> the original message and any copies of the message as well as any 
> attachment(s)
> to the original message.
>
> This email message does not form a binding contract or contract amendment 
> with
> the sender, unless it clearly states in writing that it is a contract or 
> contract amendment.