HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Robert Dean <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:36:26 -0800
MIME-Version:
1.0
X-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>, ACRA <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Perhaps I am wrong on my timeline, but it seems like we are coming up on the
45 / 50 year mark for suction dredging for gold/precious metals by
small-scale operations utilizing the type of small suction dredges widely
available today.

Since suction dredges are so ubiquitous to the gold-bearing streams here in
southcentral Alaska, I am starting to wonder if at some point we might
consider a particular small-scale suction dredging operation significant, as
illustrative of a broad pattern of change in placer gold mining.

Whatever the case, I am simply wondering if anyone has already treated this
issue from a National Register perspective, or is even considering the idea.
Though perhaps I am jumping the gun, as I cannot remember exactly when
small-scale suction dredges became available.

-Max Dean

ATOM RSS1 RSS2