Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:44:41 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
??> Bob, you havn't cited any statistics that show a majority
>> of Midwestern farmers are planting corn on corn instead
>> of rotating.
>
The stats are out there if you want to look by calling the different USDA
offices in the Midwest. I have been keeping hives around the fields in my
area for over thirty years. I see what is being planted!
I have access to the ariel corn plot photos at my USDA office.
(as do others as is public information)
>
> Tube video that shows honeybees gather nectar/pollen
>> from corn" the only one anyone could come up with
>> was from a garden of sweet corn near the east coast
>> (99% of Midwestern corn is field corn, not sweet corn).
>
>The above insults the beekeepers on the BEE-L list intelligence. Do
> you really think bees will only gather pollen from only sweet corn?
Bees do not gather nectar from corn as you write above.
By now I would think its time to drop the "bees do not gather corn pollen
hypothesis".
>> One must also consider any given field of corn sheds
>> pollen for only 7-10 days out of the whole growing season
>
What about the FACT corn is planted in a field within flying distance of
most Midwest corn country hives almost daily in the planting season. All
producing pollen at
different times giving the bees access to the pollen every day for a couple
months.
I believe bees do not like corn pollen ( as compared to other pollens) but
will at times fill many frames with corn pollen.
>> Thus all this evidence, taken together, suggests extremely
>> limited potential for bees to be exposed to more
>> than trace quantities of neonics in the corn belt states.
Show me the proof (like I have asked you for both on this list and
another )that trace amounts of the neonics (which you admit to above) sub
lethal are not harmful to my bees.
The American Honey Producers Assn. lists their research priorities at their
website> I think you can see fungicides and sub-lethal effects of pesticides
are high on the list.
From their website:
1. Varroa mite research
2.CCD
3.fungicides
4.sub-lethal effects of pesticides
5.nosema
6.SHB research
7.bee genetics
8.honeybee viruses
9.wax moth control
10.chalkbrood
11.biological controls for bee pests.
*In my opinion *the AHPA ( Adee Honey Farms) has more influence with the
USDA
than the ABF. The top five of the above list s being pushed for research.
As one can see honey bee virus research is number 8 way down the list (even
below bee genetics and SHB research) which could* partially *explain why the
USDA has not been more responsive to my friend Jerry Brumenshenks request
for virus research funding.
I think its time we quit wasting research money on small hive beetle
research.! SHB has been in the U.S. since 1998 and a huge amount of money
has been spent with little return on the money. We know all we need to know
about these beetles! A good hit with a fly swatter kills SHB.(kidding!)
> bob
Many of us believe virus issues are a symptom of the problem rather than the
problem but further research is needed.
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm
|
|
|