Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:36:01 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> "[It] was completed almost two years ago but it has been too long in getting
>out," he said. "I have submitted my manuscript to a new
> journal but cannot give a publication date or share more of this with you at
>this time."
That tends to imply that the Pettis paper was rejected, and so this journalist
has gone too far. The paper would be classed as relevant science presumably, so
if it was written well that implies that maybe the methodology or the
conclusions did not meet with the approval of the reviewers. The same newspaper
journalist picked up on some other stuff given to him by some of the shriller
anti-pesticide people in the UK, so he has a history of siding with the
campaigners.
I've read the French work (Alaux et al) and although it is interesting,
apparently showing a modest rise in deaths of bees in the test above the greater
lethality of Nosema alone, there is something you make you hesitate before
accepting it at face value. Imidacloprid was delivered to the bees at three
levels over a 100-fold range of concentrations. Why was there no dose-response?
I think that - for now - you have to fall back on the several studies which
looked and failed to find an association between colony losses or ill-health and
pesticide residues in colony samples.
Two sides to the Precautionary Principle:
1. Bin the whole class of pesticides even though there is no evidence of much
or even any harm from them, but lots of people seem to suspect that there might
be.
2. Keep them as the pesticides they are replacing are apparently nastier, and
cause real harm to humans and to wildlife. Besides, global food prices are on
the rise, indicating that the world just can't afford the luxury of ditching
major classes of crop protection products without good reason.
Gavin
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm
|
|
|