Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 8 Mar 2009 13:21:59 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>
> >I do not place credit solely at the colony level for the hardier bee, But
> IMO, much of the credit goes to the population as a whole and its
> sustainability against disease and pests.
Joe, that is the gist of what I am seeing. In nature, evolution happens at
the population level. This is especially true in bee colonies, where the
"organism" has some 15-20 parents (the queen and all the drones that she
mated with). So any colony of bees reflects a cross-section of the local
population.
What I'm finding in the population that I deal with (my managed colonies
plus the escapees and ferals within mating distance) that there is a bell
curve of mite resistance across the board. There are always a few colonies
that control mites well themselves, and a number at the other end that
don't. It is heartening that the median is slowly shifting to fewer mites.
The problem for those such as I who depend upon income from bees to pay the
bills, is that it can be costly (in lost colonies) to sustain a selective
pressure to eliminate mite-susceptible colonies. I do the best I can by
trying to eliminate any mite-susceptible colonies from my mating yards.
This requires the sampling of every colony to determine mite levels.
At this point in time, I still cannot maintain an economically viable
commercial operation without the occasional treatment. Last year, we had
good results with a winter oxalic dribble, a bit of drone trapping, and a
couple of Apiguard thymol gel treatments.
I'm curious to hear from some of you who run Russian bees...
Randy Oliver
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|