BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Subject:
From:
Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:37:10 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:01:02 -0700, randy oliver <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Has anyone seen any actual data from a trial?

Not exactly, but in order to muddy the waters, how about this:

> While faster developing queens mature earlier and are therefore able to emerge sooner,
workers may imprison queens in their cells for as many as 5 days using a variety of 
behaviours. 

"The influence of queen age and quality during queen replacement in honeybee colonies" by 
David R. Tarpy, et al  
Animal Behaviour Volume 59, Issue 1, January 2000, Pages 97-101

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned 
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2