In message <[log in to unmask]>, Gavin Ramsay
<[log in to unmask]> writes
Murray ... who I fully expect to join the SBA in 2010 ;-) ... has a
couple of hundred fold greater than the 10 hive limit and might have a
considerable supplement to pay should he decide to insure his stock. In
general commercial beekeepers have carried their own risk and made no
particular provision for the damaging losses from large disease
outbreaks.
No compensation is paid for bee diseases. Destructions are mandatory for
ALL AFB case no matter how minor, and for EFB in severe cases.
Association insurance policies have, as Gavin correctly states, and
upper limit of 10 hives, subject to an overall upper limit on total
claims, after which level is reached they are paid out pro rata. Thus
from this you can twig that it is only paid out at season end once the
total is known.
In our case we destroyed 154 colonies in total for EFB, we did not find
any AFB. Even IF this lot was covered you get the complicating factor
that of that 154, somewhere between 0 and 20 were actually at the
compulsory level, and the rest could be deemed a commercial decision.
The reasons for that are twofold. Firstly we wanted to root it out as
far as we could so ANY symptomatics were destroyed. Secondly is that if
we did not we would have had to 'shook swarm' all the ones with
symptoms, and have the entire unit under a standstill order for 6 weeks,
which would have been in force from just before our single most
important migration of the year, to the heather.
Cold facts are that destroying the 154 colonies has an attached loss of
approx GBP 23 K. Missing our heather crop would carry an average loss of
GBP 180K. The maths are pretty stark. The real impact on me and my staff
could be even more stark...........unemployment, bankruptcy etc etc.
Private insurance is very costly. Myself and a couple of other bee
people have been down the same route before. In my case the premiums
asked were so high that even a loss like this one EVERY year would still
be much cheaper than the insurance. Add in the fact that this is our
outfits first foulbrood outbreak since my father set it up in 1950 and
you get the picture. The risk is tiny and the premiums ferocious. So we
carry our own risk well aware that occasionally it might work the wrong
way, but over a period it is in your favour NOT to insure, and to date
we have never suffered a loss that would come close to equating to the
insurance premium.
Gavin, not sure the SBA would want me, lol. I am quite sure the
organisation is better off, and more stable, without any of the 'big
dogs' to unbalance issues. As you are very well aware (but the
readership may not be) we have our own organisation where our presence
is more appropriate.
Must be winter time.............drawn me out of my lurker cave in which
I vowed to stay. ( Really do not have time, no matter how tempted I am,
to argue with 'armchair experts' with high ideals in what HAS to be a
pragmatic world. Have 50,000 frames to assemble, wire, and wax all
before April, and limited staff to do it until mid Feb when the
seasonals start returning. Add in a complete reworking of ALL our
existing brood combs from the unit with the infection and you get the
picture.)
--
Murray McGregor
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
Access BEE-L directly at:
http://community.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-LSOFTDONATIONS.exe?A0=BEE-L
|