BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Date:
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:18:37 -0700
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
<7A4B608C26C144B1A943A575CF1DF17B@Romulus>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
HI Allen,

You are absolutely correct, and I've gone over this in my articles in ABJ.

It is time consuming to subsample larger samples.  And yes, I have gone
through samples bee by bee.  Yes, one badly infected bee can very much skew
the sample.

At a 4-5M infection level at the entrance, for N ceranae, maybe 5% of the
entrance bees will show an infection, and maybe 2% of the house bees.

For bees at the entrance, I'd recommend taking at least 50 bees;  from
inside, at least 100.  These samples will give you an average idea of the
overall infection rate, and correlates fairly well with the percentage of
bees infected, as Juanse mentioned.

For larger apiaries, I'd do an entire apiary sample from the entrances, then
follow the protocol on my website for processing large samples.  This will
give you the most meaningful infection number, since you will likely be
treating by yard, not by individual colony.

Randy Oliver

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Access BEE-L directly at:
http://community.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-LSOFTDONATIONS.exe?A0=BEE-L

ATOM RSS1 RSS2