Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Jan 2011 13:56:33 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
ISEN-ASTC-L is a service of the Association of Science-Technology Centers
Incorporated, a worldwide network of science museums and related institutions.
*****************************************************************************
What a great way to start out the new year!! I'd like to thank Charlie
for asking such a potentially inflammatory question in so thoughtful
and respectful a manner. You can't have a difficult conversation if
you start off being rude or snarky, and I'm glad Charlie was able to
resist the temptation to slip in a zinger or two.
I am also eager to see what my evaluation colleagues have to say. In
my own 20+ years in exhibits, I don't think I've ever worked on an
exhibit or exhibition that couldn't have benefited from both
evaluation and a willingness to make changes based on patterns of user
behavior, not just anecdote. Personally, the best exhibition I've ever
worked on went through rigorous (and I do mean rigorous) formative
evaluation. The key difference with that project was that it had a
budget for both remedial evaluation and for making changes after
opening based on the remedial. Particularly on the scale of an
exhibition, remedial evaluation is critical. Individual components can
be tested til the cows come home and never tell you how they'll
interact with each other in a room full of people. It never fails to
humble me to see how unpredictable visitors in a gallery can be.
In a way, the reactions to this comment remind me a lot of the way
accessibility gets discussed. When you frame the discussion as "the
government makes us do all this stuff and it costs money I could spend
on other stuff." then it's hard to see beyond that to essential
issues. If evaluation is just something you put in to satisfy NSF,
then you're probably not oing to learn anything useful from it. The
same goes for ADA. If your goal is just to "be in compliance", then
ADA will always be a millstone.
Does evaluation cost? Yes. I know I've choked when reading the odd
evaluation budget or two in the past. Does it provide benefit? In my
experience, yes. Does the latter justify the former? Now that's an
interesting question. I suppose that depends on how you do it and why
you do it.
Ed
***********************************************************************
For information about the Association of Science-Technology Centers and the Informal Science Education Network please visit www.astc.org.
Check out the latest case studies and reviews on ExhibitFiles at www.exhibitfiles.org.
The ISEN-ASTC-L email list is powered by LISTSERVR software from L-Soft. To learn more, visit
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html.
To remove your e-mail address from the ISEN-ASTC-L list, send the
message SIGNOFF ISEN-ASTC-L in the BODY of a message to
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|