BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Allen Dick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:57:43 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
> Farrar kept bees in Illinois supers as did most if not all the bee labs at
> the time. Farrar used a method I have never seen duplicated anyplace in
> the world for swarm control and also made the need to reverse not as
> necessary.

I built and used Farrar (Square 6-5/8 equipment) when I first started out,
and followed the ideas, but concluded that there was little if any advantage
over standard commercial equipment.

> Jaycox found ... bees can be downsized and upsized 17% through changes in
> cell size.

Do you know if this was determined by linear, volumetric or mass
measurement? 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned 
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2