BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:36:57 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
>We did find treatment effects for adult bee population in July 2007 and May 2008, in both cases with small cell colonies having significantly more bees (Table 1; Fig. 1). We are uncertain why this occurred. It is possible that a 1 kg package of small cell bees contains more bees than a standard package since bees reared in small cells are significantly smaller than bees raised on standard cells 

One could speculate also that larger bees cover more *ground* and can thermoregulate and feed an equivalent brood area.  It would be interesting to determine the root cause of this difference.

>Both groups exceeded published economic thresholds (*3,000 mites per colony (Delaplane and Hood 1999) by the end of the yearlong study.

Am I right in interpreting that the total number of mites per colony was about the same for SC and the controls?  In that case, the number of mites per 100 bees was smaller in SC since there were more bees. 

Sorry.  I like to ask questions to better understand.

Waldemar

____________________________________________________________
Get educated.  Click here for Adult Education programs.
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxVwOw7Th3ngFCa5taOvlfGJnayJc2oaKRdnCMPcHh6g6D9a9pzHGY/

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned 
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2