Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - HISTARCH Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
HISTARCH Home HISTARCH Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: History and Archaeology Blurring the lines
From:
geoff carver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 7 Mar 2009 17:57:44 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
Reminds me as well that the situation in the English-speaking world is not
necessarily typical; my wife got her MA in medieval history in Spain, where
they either don't or at least didn't used to have archaeology as a first
degree topic; you had to switch to it later...
Also thinking of some great examples of historical archaeology: "In small
things forgotten," for example
On the other hand, I'm increasingly convinced, from comparing histories of
archaeology with the original historical documents (i.e. site "reports" from
pre-1880) that archaeologists make pretty lousy historians...

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV