HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jason Schmerer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Mar 2009 16:57:49 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
I am not sure if this is for this list(s) or not but here goes anything.

I have been doing quite a bit of research lately about the Spanish period in
East Florida and the colonial period archaeology and in history books for
the NE FL and SE GA area.  I am though a archaeologist at heart and will
forever be.  It seems that history and archaeology can go hand in hand but
to no avail, so it seems in academia, that historians and archeologist do
not like one another.  Lately it seems that history and archaeology are
coming together and feeding off one another which is something that we as
archaeologists and historians must do to continue our research, right?  If I
am wrong then what will happen to the all the artifacts.  Archaeologist dig
up the artifacts, sorry for saying that in a terrible way, but it is true
and historians work on the written record, right, and help the archaeologist
interpret the dug up artifacts?  So what is wrong with academia coming
together, as in the CRM field where archaeologist and historians work hand
in hand.  I would gladly work with a historian and I am planning on getting
a MA in History soon and a PhD in Archaeology, with all do hope.  I see in
academia just by reading the posts and talking with people that the new
archaeologist and historians are coming together as a team to work on a site
or historical research topic of interest.  Would it not be fascinating to
find a archaeologist and historian to work together to find a great site of
interest, for instance Fort Caroline.

On another note what about forming a new new sub-field of archaeology or
history that deals with just this issue of blurring the lines between
history, archaeology or even add in sociology and cultural anthropology.
Why cannot we have a system that brings these fields/sub-fields together
and, again forms a new history or archaeology of the 21st Century?  If there
is a academic system that this exists in let me know.

If I am wrong and maybe a lot naive in my comments that archaeologists and
historians do not work together, especially in academia, please let me
know.  I fully admit and could very well be wrong in all of this.

I will look forward to the comments.

Jason Schmerer

ATOM RSS1 RSS2