Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:44:28 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
<D1D040193BFF4919A7187CD5D1901F5F@bobPC> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I'll leave it to the current experts on the 2,4-D itself. Back in the
early 80's I did extensive literature searches for a project for the CA
Board of Water Resources on 'Ag effects on instream beneficial uses in
the San Joaquin watershed'. A couple of interesting tidbits,
especially considering how limited the testing sensitivities were in
those days: 1) Effects at the 6 parts per trillion level on fish
development, especially spines, for some pesticides (toxaphene for one) and
2) Most of the damage to aquatic and riparian (stream edge)
invertebrates was from 'inert' ingredients such as the surfactants and
adjuvants used in herbicides and insecticides. In particular
surfactants, which include soaps and detergents, affect the surface
tension of the spiracle and other membranes and thus affect respiration
at very low levels when there is direct contact. Oils also are used,
and can layer on liquid surfaces. I'm sure much more is known now on
the physiological effects.
The take-away, beware the 'inert' ingredients.
Carolyn in SC
Bob Harrison wrote:
> ...It is my understanding that 24D only kills bees when sprayed on bees and
> the
> bees do not make it back to the hive.
> I would appreciate any information the list could provide involving the use
> of 24D and honeybees. Jerry B.?
> Thanks in advance.
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|