BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Sender:
[log in to unmask]
Subject:
Re: Drone Comb Destruction versus Removal/Replacement
From:
ALDEN MARSHALL <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 1 Jan 2009 16:16:48 -0500
MIME-version:
1.0
Content-type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=utf-8; reply-type=original
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines) 
> Average honey
> production in the treatment group was significantly
> greater than production in the control group during
> period 1, similar to production in the control group
> during period 2, and perhaps greater overall when
> measured over the season (P < 0.07). This suggests
> some added benefit from drone brood removal in
> addition to the maintenance of lower mite levels.
>
    Though I have no empirical evidence, this has been my impression for the 
past couple  of years when comparing to my fellow beeks in the area. 

*******************************************************
* Search the BEE-L archives at:                       *
* http://listserv.albany.edu:8080/cgi-bin/wa?S1=bee-l *
*******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2