BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:30:02 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
> "Sources of Mite Resistant Queen Bees",

A nice list, to be sure, but it is based entirely on advertising
claims without independent corroboration of any sort. No researchers
will touch this, because of fear of repercussions from the industry.
So much for free flow of information.

* * *

At least a few researchers have the courage to publish potentially
contentious work.

> The honey bee attractant Fruit BoostTM was tested for its efficacy in focusing honey bees onto the target crop (watermelon) and improving pollination. Fruit Boost did not significantly affect total number of honey bees visiting watermelon flowers, the proportion of honey bee visits that occurred on female flowers, fruit-set, or fruit weight.

-- 
An evaluation of Fruit-BoostTM as an aid for honey bee pollination
under conditions of competing bloom.

Amanda Ellis and Keith S. Delaplane
Journal of Apicultural Research
Vol. 48 (1) pp. 15 - 18

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned 
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2