Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:15:52 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
One thing that still remains open is how much contamination is from either
incorrect use, or use of non-beekeeping pesticide used in the hive. There
are many that buy off-use pesticides and use them for Varroa and have been
doing so for years. When one becomes ineffective, they just shift to
another.
I would never use cumophose but did use Apistan. I would like to say I am
pure and always used it IAW directions, but there was a winter when I just
decided to leave it on. And I was not alone in that. Some beekeepers
recommend just that.
My guess is that most contamination is not from proper use but improper-
except for cumaphose. Also, most problems are from non-rotation of comb, a
basic practice in all bee books.
Sometimes I wonder if we should lay off banning bee pesticides and just ban
beekeepers. Selectively, of course. :) Like the Mikado, I have a little
list.
Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|