BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
[log in to unmask]
Subject:
Re: Conversion - Honey - Volume to Weight
From:
Peter Edwards <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Sep 2008 23:35:21 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines) 
Chris wrote:

> I have it in my mind, whence I don't know - Wedmore maybe -that the 
> relative
> density of honey is 1.6

White (1975) gave values as shown here:

http://www.fao.org/docrep/w0076e/w0076e04.htm

I had always thought 1.42 was generally correct for the honeys from the UK, 
where the average wate content seems to be around 17.5%.
Best wishes

Peter Edwards
beekeepers at stratford-upon-avon.freeserve.co.uk
www.stratford-upon-avon.freeserve.co.uk/

****************************************************
* General Information About BEE-L is available at: *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/default.htm   *
****************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2